-
"When I get new evidence I change my mind. What do you do?" John Maynard Keynes
squareONE sites
-
Recent Posts
- Work In Progress: The Problem of Peace In the Context of Religions
- Teaching Cartoon: Secret of a Long Life
- Sitting On the Bay
- Free Play Means Free Plus Play
- ARK Pieces; and About Process
- Google Glass Chamber Music Mix
- Scrappers Edge Freeplayers 6-5!
- Painting on a Pad
- The Adolescence of the Tubes
- Gods of the Abstract Social
- Twenty Six Zeroes! The Oldest Sound
- Rep ‘n’ learnin’
- Ding Dong
- Another Grid; A Green Man
- Doorkeepers of the Heart
Essentials
Connect Me
google+ Linkedin Facebook Twitter visual experimentation Profile academia.edu sound design and music: nogutsnoglorystudios Dr. Abdullah Ibrahim Mantra Modes Imaginal Musicology Rhythm River Twitter (Kamelmauz) Recordings Kamelmauz.Bandcamp
nogutsnoglory blogPages
Categories
-
If, during the long course of ages and under varying conditions of life, organic beings vary at all in the several parts of their organization, and I think this cannot be disputed; if there be, owing to the high geometric powers of increase of each species, at some age, season or year, a severe struggle for life, and this certainly cannot be disputed; then, considering the infinite complexity of the relations of all organic beings to each other and to their conditions of existence, causing an infinite variety in structure, constitution, and habits, to be advantageous to them, I think it would be a most extraordinary fact if no variation ever had occurred useful to each being’s own welfare, in the same way as so many variations have occurred useful to man. But if variations useful to any organic being do occur, assuredly individuals thus characterized will have the best chance of being preserved in the struggle for life; and from the strong principle of inheritance they will tend to produce offspring similarly characterized. This principle of preservation, I have called, for the sake of brevity, Natural Selection. [Charles Darwin (1859) On the Origin of Species]

a-list: friends, colleagues, like-minded, fave thought leaders
- alexanne don
- alice o. howell
- Annie Murphy Paul
- B-Music Collective
- barb leslie photography
- Barbara McAfee
- bill callahan
- Bill Moyers
- bryan alexander
- Cara Finnegan
- charles cameron
- chris corrigan
- Chris Hoff
- connectivism
- crispin sartwell
- daniel gustav anderson
- david & alice kolb
- david brin
- deborah mattingly conner
- Derek Melser
- Diane Ravitch
- dick richards
- Doc Searles
- Doug Ashford
- edward vielmetti
- eve neuhaus
- EvoS Consortium Blog
- frank a. mills
- gardner campbell
- george nemeth
- george por
- gerald swatez
- Haikus and Pics
- heward wilkinson
- holly harlan@E4S
- Ian Glendinning's Psybertron
- jack ricchuito
- james howard kuntsler
- jamie cohen – r.i.p.
- Jean Raffa
- jessica williams
- jim hightower
- jim&miriam@executive edge
- kate kuper
- Leonardo Solaas
- leslie yerkes
- Lewis Lapham (podcasts)
- linda kahn
- Lisa Houck
- marc lefkowitz
- Metanexus
- mike dickman
- Noel G. Charlton
- Otis Funkmeyer
- pat kane-play ethic
- peter levine
- robert g. longpre
- Salikah Al-Tariq
- Sandra Huggen
- scholars and rogues
- sean jacobs
- shakesville
- steve dahlberg
- taddy & sybil
- the defeatists
- thivai abhor
- tim boucher
- tim quinlan
- Tom Slee
- Toward a Buddhist Philosophy of Science
- Tucker Stilley
- vincent horn
- virginia postrel
- walter logeman
- ~Generative.Net
-
“It is essential to such a government, that it be derived from the great body of the society, not from an inconsiderable proportion, or a favored class of it; otherwise a handful of tyrannical nobles, exercising their oppressions by a delegation of their powers, might aspire to the rank of republicans, and claim for their government the honorable title of republic.” James Madison Random Blogroll
- Lisa Houck
- scholars and rogues
- the thought occurs
- Snuggle Factory
- The City Journal
- Humour Only
- Wired
- dienekes anthropology blog
- walter logeman in this moment
- mike dickman
- pandasthumb
- News at Science Magazine
- savageminds
- william vallicella
- Marco Arment
- if charlie parker was a gunslinger…
- Why i Am Catholic
- Open Semiotics
- kevin kelly
- Sandra Huggen
-
All the property that is necessary to a Man, for the Conservation of the Individual and the Propagation of the Species, is his natural Right, which none can justly deprive him of: But all Property superfluous to such purposes is the Property of the Publick, who, by their Laws, have created it, and who may therefore by other laws dispose of it, whenever the Welfare of the Publick shall demand such Disposition. He that does not like civil Society on these Terms, let him retire and live among Savages. He can have no right to the benefits of Society, who will not pay his Club towards the Support of it. -Benjamin Franklin
IO9- V/H/S/ 2 trailer teases scary aliens, FINALLY May 21, 2013We are so excited for the sequel to the horror anthology, V/H/S/2. Because this time, THERE BE ALIENS! Too long have we gone without genuinely horrifying aliens.Read more... […]
- Pentagram Bikini: For the Sunbather Unafraid of Satanic Tan Lines May 21, 2013For the beach bunny with strong beliefs, or a strong desire for a Pentagram-tan-line chest. Either way, you do you girl. Read more... […]
- Paolo Soleri and the Cities of the Future May 21, 2013Paolo Soleri, who died last month at 93, transformed the way people imagine cities of the future. You've probably seen some of his concepts without realizing it. He even built an experimental city in Arizona, called Arcosanti. We've got a gallery of his drawings and designs, some of which have never been online before.Read more... […]
- Steven Spielberg is making a live action Halo series May 21, 2013You're finally getting that live-action Halo you've been clamoring for, and it's going to be produced by Steven Spielberg. Poor Neill Blomkamp. Read more... […]
- Gawker Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Faggot: Inside Marine Corps Boot Camp | Lifehacker How Can I Set Up My May 21, 2013Gawker Don't Ask, Don't Tell, Faggot: Inside Marine Corps Boot Camp | Lifehacker How Can I Set Up My Parents' Computer To Avoid Future Problems? | Gizmodo Xbox One: Everything You Need to Know About Microsoft's New Console | io9 A Close-up Look at the Star Trek Easter Egg You Might Have MissedRead more... […]
- V/H/S/ 2 trailer teases scary aliens, FINALLY May 21, 2013
Make Blog- Animatronic Beaker Puppet Lip-Syncs to Tunes May 21, 2013
- MAKE Asks: Projects from our Pages May 21, 2013
- Controlling 5 Servos With a Raspberry Pi May 21, 2013
- LA Times: Maker Faire may be Silicon Valley’s Most Important Export May 21, 2013
- Pirate Pancake Follows Captain Crepe May 21, 2013
Weird UniverseMeta
Tag Archives: Election 2012
The fact-checkers handed Romney his butt.
But then came Colorado for the president and Florida also was looking tougher than anyone had imagined.
“We just felt, ‘where’s our path?’” said a senior adviser. “There wasn’t one.”
Romney then said what they knew: it was over.
His personal assistant, Garrett Jackson, called his counterpart on Mr. Obama’s staff, Marvin Nicholson. “Is your boss available?” Jackson asked.
Romney was stoic as he talked to the president, an aide said, but his wife Ann cried. Running mate Paul Ryan seemed genuinely shocked, the adviser said. Ryan’s wife Janna also was shaken and cried softly.
“There’s nothing worse than when you think you’re going to win, and you don’t,” said another adviser. “It was like a sucker punch.”
Their emotion was visible on their faces when they walked on stage after Romney finished his remarks, which Romney had hastily composed, knowing he had to say something.
Both wives looked stricken, and Ryan himself seemed grim. They all were thrust on that stage without understanding what had just happened.
“He was shellshocked,” one adviser said of Romney.
Romney and his campaign had gone into the evening confident they had a good path to victory, for emotional and intellectual reasons. The huge and enthusiastic crowds in swing state after swing state in recent weeks – not only for Romney but also for Paul Ryan – bolstered what they believed intellectually: that Obama would not get the kind of turnout he had in 2008.
They thought intensity and enthusiasm were on their side this time – poll after poll showed Republicans were more motivated to vote than Democrats – and that would translate into votes for Romney. Romney Shellshocked By Loss
And to think: Romney prides himself on being data-driven, and Ryan is a self-described ‘numbers guy.’
Going into election day my hunch was that Romney would get plastered by votes from: minorities, women, under-30s, and, that the GOP war-on-women may incur blowback among GOP women too. Maybe GOP women would stay home at historic levels of refusal! Against this I figured on strong turn out of old white guys where it didn’t really matter. The tracking polls in Ohio suggested a small turnout bump would make all the difference, and, this is what happened.
I also felt that in Ohio, where I live, Romney’s outrageous TV ad about Obama and Jeep, once thoroughly debunked, started to serve a new purpose, reminding viewers that Romney didn’t care about the facts. And, much worse, by not pulling the ad, it sent the message Romney believed voters in Ohio to be fools and suckers. It seems that Romney didn’t have any social psychologists on his team!
In the end which Romney lost, the arch right winger of the primaries or the pseudo-Reaganesque moderate of the general election? We will likely never know. Say what you will about the ongoing ideological battle in America, this election demonstrated what I call the problem of the GOP empty suit.






